Software development document template: how to write plans and plans
Explain clearly the document system of the software development document template, as well as what and how to write the software development plan and software development plan respectively, and provide a structure that can be filled in directly in the Word or UniDoc editor.
Key points of this article
- The plan answers "what to do, how to do it, and why", and the plan answers "who, when, and at what pace to do it." Do not mix the two parts.
- Project-level documents are usually a set of documents. A document list is listed first, and then the boundaries and responsible persons of each document are determined.
- When selecting technology, you need to write down the reasons and alternatives, and only the conclusion. It will be difficult to convince others during the review.
- Each milestone must clearly state the deliverables and completion standards, otherwise the plan cannot be accepted.
- Fixed the title hierarchy, table styles and revision history, so subsequent projects only need to replace the placeholders.
If you are responsible for a software project for the first time, you will often be asked to "come up with a plan first" and then make up a "plan". After opening a blank document, I don’t know where to start. I often end up writing a mixture of meeting minutes and task lists. During the review, no one can tell what questions it answers. This article is aimed at project leaders and developers. It explains how to build a software development document template, focusing on project-level solutions and plans, rather than a single work summary.
After reading, you can get three things: a set of methods for dividing the document system, the structure and writing methods of plans and plans, and the steps to layout the template in Word or UniDoc editor. The examples in this article all use placeholders, just replace them with the content of your own project.
Should the software development plan and plan be written separately? One sentence conclusion
They should be written separately: the plan stipulates "what to do and how to do it", and the plan stipulates "who, when and at what pace to do it". The same document should also be presented in chapters.
| your situation | Recommended practices | reason |
|---|---|---|
| The team is small and the cycle is only a few weeks | Synthesize a project document, with the plan in front and the plan in the back | There are few documents and only one copy will be read during the review. |
| Separate approval across departments, technology and scheduling | The plan and plan are split into two documents | Technical reviewers and scheduling approvers are different |
| Demand is not yet stable | The plan only contains principles and scope boundaries, and plans are only scheduled to recent milestones. | There will be more changes in the later stage, and the detailed arrangement will soon be invalidated. |
| Customer requires formal delivery | Submit documents one by one according to the document list, with revision records attached | Facilitates acceptance and traceability |
| The organization already has a unified template | Based on the organizational template, this article is structured as a checklist | Avoid duplication of standards |
Template structure overview
| part | what to write | Space suggestion |
|---|---|---|
| Document information | Project name, version, author, reviewer, revision record | a table |
| Project background and goals | Problem to be solved, business goals, success criteria | 1–2 paragraphs |
| scope and boundaries | What is included in this issue and what is explicitly not included | 3–5 items |
| Technical solution | Architecture, technology selection and rationale, interfaces and data | 2–4 segments, can be equipped with architecture diagram |
| Risks and Responses | Risk description, impact, response measures, responsible person | 3–5 items |
| development plan | Phase division, milestones, deliverables, completion criteria | a table |
| Personnel and division of labor | Roles, Responsibilities, Responsible Persons | a table |
| Acceptance criteria | Completion conditions for each deliverable | 3–5 items |
How to write part by part
Document information and document list
List the document set of this project at the beginning of the document, such as "Software Development Plan", "Software Development Plan", "Requirements Specification", "Test Plan" and "User Manual". Each document states the file name, version, person responsible and status. The work summary after the end of the project belongs to another type of document and will not be discussed here.
Example: "[Project name] software development plan, v [version number], person in charge [name], status [draft/under review/released]."
Project background and goals
Use two or three sentences to explain the current situation and problems, and then write down the goals. The goal should be checkable, and don’t write vague statements like"improving the experience."
Example: "Goal: [Functional module] goes live by [date], covers [business scope], and [metric] reaches [number] after go-live."
Scope and Boundary
Divided into two columns: "Included in this period" and "Not included in this period". Exclusions are easy to overlook, but they are key to controlling later requirements creep.
Example: "This issue contains [Module A] and [Module B]; this issue does not include [Module C], which is left for the second phase of evaluation."
Technical solution
First give the overall structure, and then write down the selection item by item. Write three things about each selection: what you chose, why you chose it, what alternatives you considered, and the reasons why you didn’t choose it.
Example: "[Framework] was adopted for the backend because the team had experience with it and sufficient problem data; the alternative [Framework] was not adopted for [Reason]."
Risks and Responses
Write down the risks, impacts, responses and responsible persons in a table or list. Risks need to be specific enough that you can take action in advance.
Example: The risk is [relying party interface delay], the impact is [joint debugging time compression], the response is to develop with simulated data first, and confirm the interface before [date], the responsible person [name].
Development Plan
Divided by stages, the common ones are requirement confirmation, design, development, testing, and launch. Write down the completion time, deliverables and completion criteria for each milestone. Use [date] as a placeholder for the time, and fill it in after the schedule is confirmed.
Example: Milestone "Interface joint debugging completed", time [date], deliverables are [interface document] and [joint debugging report], completion standard is [interface use case] all passed.
Personnel and division of labor
List roles, responsibilities and responsible persons. If one person plays multiple roles, indicate the priority to avoid any link that no one is responsible for.
Acceptance criteria
Each deliverable corresponds to an acceptance criterion, which is written as a condition that can be checked, such as "all functional lists have passed testing, and remaining defects have been confirmed by [role]". Avoid writing something that cannot be judged by just saying "it worked well."
Layout in the editor
- In Word, use "Title 1" to divide the plan and plan into two parts, and use "Title 2" to divide each section to facilitate automatic generation of a table of contents.
- Use the same style for all tables, and set the header row to repeat across pages, so that the column names can still be seen after turning the page of a long table.
- Place a revision record table at the beginning of the document. Update the version number and date for each change. Do not use file names such as "final version" and "final modified version."
- When multiple people need to collaborate or continue to modify on the web page, you can open the Word file in the UniDoc web editor (app.unidoc.top) and maintain compatibility with Word during editing.
- Export the review manuscript to PDF and send it, and keep the original Word file as the manuscript; if you need to sign or fill in the form on the PDF, you can use the PDF editor in the desktop client (download.omnidoc.top).
- Before publishing, search the square brackets [ ] in the full text and confirm that all placeholders have been replaced.
Common writing problems
- The proposal is written as a plan: only a timetable, without technical justification and comparison of alternatives.
- The milestone only says "development completed", there are no deliverables and completion standards, and it cannot be accepted.
- Only write "included in this issue" and do not write "not included". If you need to add it later, you will continue to add it.
- Risks are only listed, without countermeasures or responsible persons.
- Placeholders are sent to reviewers without replacement.
- Save a copy of the same file on multiple computers, and the versions will overwrite each other.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
1. What is the difference between a software development solution and a software development plan?
The plan answers what to do, how to do it, and why; the plan answers who will do which step at what time. The plan focuses on technology and scope, while the plan focuses on time and personnel.
2. Do I need to write a full set of documents for a small project?
No need. Just keep the documentation information, scope and boundaries, technical solutions, and milestones. Risks and acceptance criteria can be added when the project enters a critical stage.
3. Can the software development plan template use tables instead of text?
Tables are suitable for milestones and division of labor, but the purpose and judgment basis of each milestone need to be explained in one or two sentences, otherwise the reviewers will not understand why they are arranged in this way.
4. Can the software development plan template be directly applied to other projects?
The structure can be reused, but the background, selection, and risks must be rewritten according to the project, otherwise it will be easily questioned during the review.
📝 Summary
The core of the software development document template is to first delineate the document set, and then write the plan (what to do, how to do it) and the plan (who, when, and at what pace) separately. Each item is written to the extent that it can be inspected and accepted, and revision records are kept. After the template is fixed, changing the project only requires replacing the placeholders and rewriting the background and selection.


